Performance Guidelines

Edit this page

Consider using Any() to determine whether an IEnumerable<T> is empty (AV1800)

When a method or other member returns an IEnumerable<T> or other collection class that does not expose a Count property, use the Any() extension method rather than Count() to determine whether the collection contains items. If you do use Count(), you risk that iterating over the entire collection might have a significant impact (such as when it really is an IQueryable<T> to a persistent store).

Note: If you return an IEnumerable<T> to prevent editing from outside the owner as explained in AV1130, and you’re developing in .NET 4.5 or higher, consider the new read-only classes.

Only use async for low-intensive long-running activities (AV1820)

The usage of async won’t automagically run something on a worker thread like Task.Run does. It just adds the necessary logic to allow releasing the current thread, and marshal the result back on that same thread if a long-running asynchronous operation has completed. In other words, use async only for I/O bound operations.

Prefer Task.Run for CPU-intensive activities (AV1825)

If you do need to execute a CPU bound operation, use Task.Run to offload the work to a thread from the Thread Pool. Remember that you have to marshal the result back to your main thread manually.

Beware of mixing up await/async with Task.Wait (AV1830)

await does not block the current thread but simply instructs the compiler to generate a state-machine. However, Task.Wait blocks the thread and may even cause deadlocks (see AV1835).

Beware of async/await deadlocks in single-threaded environments (AV1835)

Consider the following asynchronous method:

private async Task GetDataAsync()
{
	var result = await MyWebService.GetDataAsync();
	return result.ToString();
}

Now when an ASP.NET MVC controller action does this:

public ActionResult ActionAsync()
{
	var data = GetDataAsync().Result;
	
	return View(data);  
}

You end up with a deadlock. Why? Because the Result property getter will block until the async operation has completed, but since an async method will automatically marshal the result back to the original thread and ASP.NET uses a single-threaded synchronization context, they’ll be waiting on each other. A similar problem can also happen on WPF, Silverlight or a Windows Store C#/XAML app. Read more about this here.